Hi, it’s been a while–more than two months–since I stopped posting here. Although I didn’t pre-plan the start of my “sabbatical,” or know at the beginning that I was taking one at all, it was a necessary and helpful thing for me to do.

During the past two months, my time and energy have been spent on family, other matters of no global import, and both physical and spiritual renewal. Many times, I had thoughts to express on this blog, but never did.

And did the world suffer? Hah! What clearer message could I have received than almost no contact from readers asking what was up. I’ve been able to reset my perspective and priorities since receiving confirmation that neither I nor this blog are crucial to the survival of the blogosphere (lol).

So what happens next here, if anything? I’ll continue to write, with a different focus. I have a plan for this blog and my soon-to-disappear podcast site.

Shel Holtz has launched a campaign to resist the blocking of employee access to online content such as blogs and social networking sites like Facebook. As an internal communications professional who recently had to deal with IT’s blocking of the MyRagan social networking site (but, interestingly, not Melcrum’s The Communicators’ Network site), I sympathize with the stop blocking campaign.

I work in the financial services subsidiary of a global automotive manufacturer, where the issue of access to external sites isn’t as clear-cut as Shel and some others might suggest. Federal auditors come regularly to inspect the company’s procedures, processes and information security. My company is serious about maintaining the privacy of its customers, and it leans toward measures that improve data security rather than increasing unfettered employee access to information.

Many times, I’ve gotten upset or shaken my head when I learned about the latest decision regarding what access to block within the company. For the most part, I have access to anything that I need to do my job well. It sometimes required me to jump through a hoop or two, to get IT to restore access to something. For example, next month, most people within my company will not be able to use the USB ports on their computers to transfer data.

That decision was based on an audit finding. When the new policy was announced via broadcast email, I started to “see red”–until I read a portion of the email that provided information on how to retain access to the USB drives.

It took a couple of conversations with our information security team, but I was able to easily and calmly explain why I need to be able to transfer digital camera images, graphic files and audio/video files. It helps that I don’t have access to sensitive customer data, so my PC and network connections are not the same security risk as a customer service representative or someone in our Credit and Funding Department.

Anyone in my company who wants to retain access to the USB ports on their PCs must follow an agreement that spells out what is proper and improper use of the USB ports. I’ve summarized the main points below to show that they are common-sense, and not draconian.

Removable Media Agreement
• Use only company approved and supplied devices for writing to removable media.
• Take all reasonable steps to assure the security of removable media and all data on removable media.
• Under no circumstances transfer ANY customer or employee private information to removable media.
• Do not put confidential information on any form of removable media without manager’s approval.
• Do not use removable media to introduce or remove any software from any company system.
• You will be responsible for the introduction or removal of data from any company system via removable media.
• Do not use any company data for personal or commercial use or gain.

Violating this policy may result in disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.

What do you think about limiting access to the USB ports of employee PCs? Is that done in your company?

Technorati tags:

People who have spent years criticizing the mannerisms and speech of President George Bush, but who now cry “foul” over video of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s laugh, are hypocrites.

Both Bush and Clinton are highly intelligent, politically savvy professionals who have been groomed and prepped for political success. Only the young and innocent, and old and dense don’t see how both Bush and Clinton has made their mannerisms part of their strategic design.

Watching the Clinton video just now, I see examples of her forced laughter used for political gain. I expect that we will see more of it, unless she and her politicos no longer obtain political hay from it.

As usual, the last laugh will be on the American people.

Whenever long periods of time go by between posts on blogs which I regularly read, I wonder what’s behind the silence. Is the blogger overworked, overtired, waylaid, apathetic or ill? In my case, I needed to step back from this blog when the number of people and tasks facing me combined with a cold/sinus infection that decreased my stamina.

The result: cobwebs on the blog.

This probably has some well-known, prolific bloggers laughing. You know, the guys who Twitter that they’re blogging about a new social media report while recording a podcast about their new wiki that is changing the face of public relations as we know it. But many of those types (at least the ones I’m picturing) are consultants who:

  • Use social media to advance their practice, by enhancing their reputation and reach, and by becoming known as “gurus” in their field,
  • Are constantly traveling, where the long flights, delays and stays in hotels provide time for blog posts and tweets, and/or
  • Are young and unattached, giving them fuller control over their schedules and priorities.

I started blogging and podcasting to get experience with these tools and techniques so that I could make informed recommendations when discussing social media with management at my employer. Don’t get me wrong: If, along the way, I had the opportunity to launch my own consultancy that provided endless professional opportunities, along with bags of cash, I’m sure that, today, I would be one of those consultants described above. I’m not knocking consultants. The fact is, many communications consultants have, directly or indirectly, taught me a lot about social media–and I remain grateful to them all.

My point is that when you look “behind the scenes” in many organizations, the reasons why so many employees are NOT blogging, podcasting or tweeting include the fact that we ARE NOT CONSULTANTS.

If my company hired a consultant to provide guidance on the possible introduction of social media within the company, management and staff would expect the consultant to tactfully, but accurately, present the facts regarding the value of social media tools and techniques–and the opportunities that would exist within the company for employing those tools and techniques.

But I’d love to hear from any internal communicators who have experienced something like this next scenario: You spend a lot of time developing a strategy for introducing social media tools and techniques within your organization–only to get pooh-poohed or outright denied the chance to make your case.

A second difference between consultants and in-house employees: free speech. Some of the most interesting blog posts that I’ve read have been written by consultants who start with the phrase, “At a company where I worked (or consulted)…” In the case of an internal communicator, every post that mentions the company has the potential to bring heat upon the author–up to and including termination. In my case, why would I jeopardize my job to write a post about a struggle that I might be having with management over social media tools or policies? The people in the trenches have a great position to gather “real-world” tales of trials and errors. But many of those tales never make it onto a blog.

So some of my silence has been caused by my decision to keep some things in my life “behind the scenes.” But that won’t stop me from writing about the rest!

It might sound like a back-handed compliment to say that the free Ragan Communications Social Media unConference on social media held today in Chicago was worth it, but I’m not being facetious.

Even a free event costs participants time and travel expenses, and if the event had not lived up to expectations, I might have reason to grumble. Thankfully (for me AND you), I would have to be picky to find something to criticize. In fact, I’m doing the exact opposite and thanking the organizing company, Ragan Communications, and the individuals who did the heavy-lifting of planning the event.

Yesterday, I signed up to lead one of the sessions (that’s the flexibility of an Unconference), and had a great time sharing some of my recent successes in moving forward with the introduction of social media within VW Credit, Inc.

I even got the kick in the pants to start blogging again, which was sorely needed and deeply appreciated.

I’ve used Sony products for a long time, including a Sony computer (Vaio) and the Walkman Bean. It has been a mixed blessing, because I love the multimedia tools that are packed into the PC, but I hate having to use the proprietary Sony ATRAC format for music saved to the Bean. Today, I found out that Sony has decided to join the rest of the world and move toward more open audio formats. Yea!

Here is the email I received from Sony:

August 30, 2007

Subject: Future of CONNECT Music Service

To Our Valued Sony CONNECT Music Customers:

Today Sony announced its intent to move to a Windows Media Technology platform for Walkman® products in the United States, Canada and Europe. We strongly believe that the decision to embrace a more open platform for these devices will enable us to provide you with a better overall experience. As a result of this change, we will be phasing out the CONNECT™ Music Service based on Sony’s ATRAC audio format in North America and Europe. Specific timing will vary by region depending on market demand, but will not be before March 2008.

We are fully committed to helping you through this important transition away from the CONNECT Music Service and providing you with the best possible guidance on how to successfully transfer your music library to an MP3 or Windows Media-compatible format, should you wish to do so. We recommend that you use any outstanding promotional codes, account credits or gift certificates available in your music account prior to March 2008, but even after the store closes you will continue to be able to play, manage, and transfer the music in your SonicStage library and on your existing ATRAC devices. If you obtain a new device, all of Sony’s new Walkman music and video players will support MP3 or Windows Media Audio format.

In the coming months we will keep you informed of the status of the CONNECT Music Service phase out in your region. Periodic updates will be posted on the CONNECT music store and on the Sony Electronics customer service site, http://esupport.sony.com/EN/news/article215.

Please note that the CONNECT e-book service for the Reader in the U.S. will not be affected.

Thank you for your business and for your continued support as we work to complete this transition with as little disruption to you as possible.

Sincerely,

Sony CONNECT Music Team

I’ll have to wait to see how easy Sony will make it to transfer my ATRAC format music to a new format. The move is coming a little late for me, because I soon plan to buy an Apple iPod and join the majority of the civilized world. (I’m just waiting to see whether I win one at a charity golf outing organized by my employer.)

Technorati Tags:, , , , ,
Generated By Technorati Tag Generator

I downloaded the beta of Windows Live Writer and am writing this very short post to test it.Caitlyn and Clue 8-06 I’ve included a photo of my daughter with our dog, to see how well it uploads images as well as text. So far, this looks great as an offline blog editor for my WordPress blog.

Neville, thanks very much for   recommending this on your blog. (Yes, I’m testing the link.)

Consumers may be wising up to the reality that cheaper not only doesn’t usually mean better, but it also can mean unsafe. China, which is manufacturing just about everything sold in American chain stores these days, is proving itself to be a less-than-trustworthy supplier as far as consumers are concerned. That has been providing opportunities for domestic manufacturers who have been beaten up rather badly in recent years because of the U.S. dollar’s exchange rate and China’s lower production costs.

A couple of years ago, I avoided a fire when I noticed that some Christmas lights, made in China, that I had strung along my wooden fence in my front yard, had overheated and begun to burn the fence. The lights had the Underwriters Laboratories seal of approval, but failed. I returned the relatively inexpensive lights to Home Depot where I purchased them, and chose to take a refund, rather than to get a replacement set. After all, why take another chance?

Who doesn’t know about the chemical, melamine, that contaminated at least two ingredients used to make more than 100 brands of dog and cat foods? China shipped melamine-tainted wheat gluten, corn gluten and rice protein concentrate to North America and South Africa. The contaminated products led to the deaths of many U.S. pets.

This week, the Chicago Tribune reported on an investigation it made into the continued sale of toys manufactured in China that have been recalled because they contain unsafe levels of lead. One test completed for the Trib found lead in a spinning top toy to be 40 times the legal limit.

These examples are a different sort of issue than the trouble that Japan had a few decades ago. I can still remember hearing about “cheap Japanese junk” that broke too soon or didn’t perform as well as U.S.-made products. But safety wasn’t raised as an issue then. It certainly is one with some Chinese-made products.

As the Tribune article states, U.S. consumers are actively looking for toys manufactured domestically, because they refuse to take a chance with the health of their children.

Unless China shows some remarkable progress in its product safety, it will lose business to more expensive, but reliable and safe, manufacturers from other countries.

Granger website sermon seriesIn addition to my full-time position as an internal communications manager, I volunteer to guide communications at the church that my family has attended for 12 years. I’ve probably faced more challenges in terms of developing communication strategies and obtaining resources of people and budget there than in any of the “professional” jobs that I’ve held throughout my 27-year career.

That’s one of the reasons why I was excited about participating in a communications workshop offered on July 30, 2007 by the staff of Granger Community Church in Granger, Indiana (USA). Granger is a solid example of how the Gospel message can reach people who have become disenchanted (even downright hostile) with “organized religion,” and who aren’t attending a church because, according to Granger leaders, they see church as too boring, intimidating, or irrelevant to their “stressed-out, hyper-speed lives,” and/or “they felt unworthy, unloved and unlovable.”

Following the communications workshop, I interviewed Kem Meyer, Granger’s communications director, along with some workshop participants. I posted the discussion on CommaKazi Speek. It was my second recorded conversation with Kem; here is the first one.

As one of the workshop participants points out in our recorded conversation, Granger has become known as a leader in effective communication to today’s tech saavy person, who may also be wary of any hype coming from institutions–including organized religion. So how has Granger reached and retained members? How has it grown from about 10 people meeting in the living room of Senior/Founding Pastor Mark Beeson and his wife, Sheila, to several thousand people worshiping in a large, modern space that also features:

  • a casual atmosphere
  • friendly people who’ll help you find your way around
  • contemporary music, powerful dramas, high-impact media presentations
  • an innovative children’s space and
  • a Starbuck®-esque café?

Communications played an important role. Although Meyer was quick to credit the terrific speaking skills of the church’s pastors, she also provided practical tips for church communications staff and volunteers.

Bad communication is when you are trying to change someone’s “world view,” Meyer said. Good communication is when you speak respectfully to a world view, even if you disagree with it. Instead of trying to send “the right message” to your audience, you need to develop communications that release “the right response.”

Meyer defines “world view” as the bias that affects the story we tell ourselves to make it easier to live in a complicated work. Examples of world view include:

  • A home-cooked meal is better for my kids
  • Church is boring and is for sissies
  • Organic food is “better”

During the communication workshop, Meyer presented five “communication myths” and four “best practices.” The five communication myths are:

  • You (the communicator) are in control
  • The more choices (products, services, message), the better
  • Advertising creates interest and reinforces the brand
  • It worked before, so it’ll work again
  • People care about what you have to say

Although I don’t have time to unwrap all of these myths, I’ll cover a couple of them. People mistakenly believe that advertising creates interest and reinforces the brand, when at best, advertising creates awareness, which is not, in and of itself, a motivating factor. Meyer pointed out that cancer creates a sort of powerful awareness in people–but that doesn’t mean that people want it. Brands are built on experiences, she added.

People remember, on average, 10% of what we read, 20% of what we hear, 30% of what we see, 40% of what we do and about 100% of what we feel, Meyer said. Emotion is the “on/off switch” for thinking.

The four best practices discussed by Meyer were:

  • Know your audience (psychographics as well as demographics)
  • Remove barriers to entry (is that tri-fold brochure and over-friendly approach to visitors attracting people–or repelling them?)
  • Reduce the noise. Life is hard enough; we shouldn’t make it harder on people trying to get our message.
  • Tell one story at a time. Act as an air traffic controller, and let the ministry leaders fly their own planes. You simply direct the flow and keep them from crashing together.

Among the practical examples of how Granger’s communications staff uses this knowledge, Meyer talked about how the church looked to attract visitors who could be hostile to Christianity and church. The church staff developed a message series titled, “The Most Irritating Things About Christians.” That series attracted people who were looking for affirmation that certain things about Christians can be seen as being irritating. Pastor Beeson was able to shape his messages to address those irritations, while affirming the reasons why Christians may act in a seemingly irritating way.

I’ve only skimmed the surface of the workshop, and haven’t talked about the practical advice for improving the communication process, adding volunteers and determining the ways to reach a particular audience or demographic. I’ll be sharing more with my church’s leadership, and may find other tidbits worthy of posting here.

If you’ve seen any of the trailers for the third movie in the Jason Bourne series, you’ll know that “The Bourne Ultimatum” promises a big heap of the ingredients that made the first two movies successful: Action, drama and mystery. It also includes a strong dose of paid product placement, just like so many modern movies.

As an employee of VW Credit, Inc., the finance subsidiary of Volkswagen of America, that paid product placement is okay in this case–because it led to me and 500 coworkers enjoying a pre-release viewing of the new Bourne thriller Thursday night in a Chicago suburb. Several VW vehicles can be spotted throughout the movie–including a lot of action involving an Audi and a VW Touareg 2 in a climatic chase scene near the end of the movie. Without spoiling the movie, let’s just say that the vehicles’ residual value (resale value) after the chase dropped significantly. That Jason Bourne must pay high insurance premiums.VW promotion with Bourne Ultimatum

It was fun to sit with my wife and coworkers and look for VW products, while enjoying one of the best movies released so far this summer. I would rate this installment on par with the first Bourne movie (The Bourne Identity) and well above the second (The Bourne Supremacy).